To Ya'an earthquake unexpected. When the enthusiastic contributions for which charities trust and controversial, faraway America, are also being raised a few days ago the Boston bombings and bombing of chemical plants in Texas donors, people conceed about the same, this contribution what the entrusted to who?Mitchell & Ness Snapbacks
"In less than 24 hours, Boston Foundation , raised more than 4 million U.S. dollars. Here is our preliminary evaluation of them." On Twitter, a "Charity Navigator" The account name constantly push all kinds of information about the charities and emergency collect some emerging charitable organizations, to provide guidance for the people's donations.
This non-profit organization established more than 10 years, and last year the number of users rose to 600 million, the largest number of the United States monitoring charities, monitoring the widest range of rating agencies.
"Every year, the emergence of a variety of new charities, especially after the big disaster. They will write compelling stories on social media, but the lack of data to support the story, sometimes the result is disaster." U.S. time on April 21 , "Charity Navigator President and CEO Ken Berg , said in an interview with this reporter," People just contributions heart, not with the brain. "Young and Reckless Snapbacks
The data show that the $ 300 billion in donations raised through public charity each year, about 400 million is not for donors initial donor purposes, the issue of fraud, this ratio is not low.
By a combination of publicly available data and individual investigation, "Charity Navigator" rating organization for the nation's more than 6000 charities, like the charitable sector, "S & P".
Berg said, is deeply conceed about five years ago after the Wenchuan earthquake, he has been subjected to Jet Li invited to participate in charitable Forum Ya'an, Sichuan earthquake . He expressed interest to enter the Chinese charity rating services, but the matter did not advance.
Boston and Texas bombings emergency
"The biggest risk is the time more you want faster the money to donate to inappropriately used the opportunity to more you do not have sufficient access to the organization's information, the more likely to make their own contributions waste." Berg said.
Boston bombings, all kinds of new charitable organizations to emerge, "Charity Navigator" immediate action, providing people with the monitoring information of the organization. After the incident in Boston and Texas, "Charity Navigator" website sharp rise in the number of users, more and more attention on its official account on the various types of social media.
Boston after the bombing, our database has most of the traditional rating agencies have not carried out any action, but saw many new institutions emerge, emergency response, look for these new organizations, trying to provide people with some preliminary judgment. "Berg said.
The emergency staff including TUGG, The One Fund and other institutions to evaluate the initial approach is to conduct background checks: "TUGG is a public charity, but is too small, we have not previously been given a rating ...... 2011 TUGG in fund-raising cost $ 84,000 but does not show administrative and project costs ... The organization does not meet the 'accountable and transparent' in a number of indicators, such as no conflict of interest policy, did not complete the independent auditors and the audit report of the monitoring committee, the lack of 5 of the voting members of the Board. "
The urgency of the matter, "Charity Navigator" and not the judgments on these rating agencies to simply provide some facts and figures.
After the disaster, there is always the rise of the new charity at this time people tend to want donations through various channels, which involves millions of dollars in things once institutions deceive donors because people's minds want the money as soon as possible to donate to the donor money will be disappeared if donors do not do search investigation, "Berg said.
However, the bombings in Texas, there have been many "Charity Navigator" rating charities to start fund-raising action. "Charity Navigator" according to the contents of the database on a web page, a list of several higher rating organizations: National Fire Protection Charity Navigator, the highest rating of four stars Martyrs Foundation (National Fallen Firefighters Foundation), Tarrant County United Way and three stars in Texas to prevent Cruelty to Animals .
"These organizations have to participate in a similar disaster fund-raising action to get a better evaluation." Berg said, "'Charity Navigator', generally we only evaluate the agency for more than five years, because they have already started to build some The standard ... we try to recommend to the people of these traditional institutions. course, bombings in Boston, we found positive emerging organization, and therefore made some adjustments on our strategy. "
Third-party independent body
A total of more than 160 million non-profit organizations in the United States, about 1.1 million public charities. "Charity Navigator" Since its establishment, including its database covering more than 6000 charitable organizations. Berg said that their next goal is to cover more than 10,000 organizations.
"It looks like we do not have to cover a sufficient number of institutions, but the charitable sector is an obvious phenomenon is obtained 85% of the total contributions to the charity of about 1% per year, and more than 6,000 charities in our ratings, accounted for about half of all contributions; if we reach 10,000 organizations, a conservative estimate of more than 70% of the money. "he said.
He is the second president of the institution, has been working here for five years.
Many communities have depth to United Way has decades of history, very good reputation, has the trust of the people. However, more than ten years ago broke one case, they have a big problem in how to use the fund-raising proceeds. This makes charity trust crisis. Later it was also found that many of the greater New York area charities there are a variety of problems, many donations did not reach the place to go, but put it in the pocket of some of the leaders.
This makes the founder of the "Charity Navigator" Dugan begin preparations to set up a foundation to provide rating services for charitable organizations. Establishment in 2000, officially released in 2002 "Charity Navigator" page.
Founder realized that people need an independent third party to assess what charity is trustworthy, making their donations will not be wasted, people also need to know in addition to avoid charity scandal, which institutions donor is the most rapid and effective, the best organizations, they can contributions to the institutions. "Berg said.The Hundreds Snapback
It is reported that, "Charity Navigator" financing mainly from three sources: 50% from the user voluntary contributions, 20% from the members of the Board, 20% from the financing of the Foundation, and 10% from advertising revenue and the sale of the database income .
Nationally, there are many like this rating agency, the rating market competition from some degree of assurance. However, many focus on a particular area, or to the membership organization of the rating agency fees, "Charity Navigator" covering the United States, publicly known to the user and rating agency fees, and does not depend on the user's reputation evaluation, but through the completion of the investigation and data monitoring rating.
To maintain its independence, Berg stressed that even if the ads on your site, it can not, directly or indirectly, from charities from being rated.
For most of the small-scale charity, Charity Navigator does not take into account the full range of energy, but also provide some help to tell people should be conceed about what issues.
The charity "S & P"
, "Charity Navigator" a total of 12 employees, responsible for reviewing the agency's annual report figures, and monthly data and rating updates on dynamic institution. They plan to staff expanded to 20 people, in response to the growing database information.
He said that generally a new charity, the staff takes about two hours of time to review, and added to the database; updates to both institutions, each takes about less than an hour's time. Routine annual report data, based on the information provided by the agencies to local govement units, year update once, but if there are significant changes in the middle of the year, each month will be updated and added to the database.
But the bigger task is to start the consultation of the donor project. Once data has been questioned, or the charity a serious problem, it will start an independent investigation, and has accumulated more than 100 additional investigation project.
Operating concept, with the Wall Street rating agencies and is not much difference.
"Charity Navigator" website clearly shows how they rated charities, can be seen to meet the how requirements charitable institutions is a good body.
A good charitable organization must meet two simple conditions: financial health (Financial), transparent responsibility .Different methods of calculation and measure the final "Charity Navigator" by one of these two standards include rating formula for the bodies hit the final score.
Of course, Berg admitted, who have scandals Association of Central Asia rating, they also have Fan error Once a problem is found, it is corrected immediately and linear cut the institution's rating.
He had a lot of exchanges and charities, but enter the Chinese market, financing and finding the right partners is a challenge.
He pointed out that the charity market in China is still far from perfect.
"If you want to understand an institution, there is no contact, it is best to call them, or go to their office, they must communicate with you those who are willing to communicate and donors, providing and sharing information agency, I feel that it would they have more confidence. "he said.
However, he said, even so, the effect is limited, the key is China needs to establish a system, charities standard information reporting, and data disclosure.
"If a charity is not an open real-time updates of the site, provide adequate and transparent data, which is not acceptable in the United States and I hope that in the next day, this phenomenon is not accepted in China."Cheap Snapbacks
snapbacks for cheap, new era caps online...
ما را در سایت snapbacks for cheap, new era caps online دنبال می کنید
برچسب : نویسنده : alecservice alecservice بازدید : 625 تاريخ : دوشنبه 9 ارديبهشت 1392 ساعت: 8:06